Version 7.1 · LANDEX integration

Cumberland + York + Lancaster + Perry + Lebanon + Adams + Franklin

Compare county power structures without collapsing distinct jurisdictions or treating association as evidence of misconduct.

7counties
0nodes
0relations
0primary
Regional networkClick a node or edge for evidence
County comparisonVerified base governance + research readiness
Regional chronology
Evidence ledger
IDCountyGradeDateFrom → ToRelationshipStatusEvidence
Source registerPrimary sources preferred
LANDEX Integration HubCounty land-record workflow
1 · API / WebhookPreferred only if LANDEX provides documented, authorized API or webhook access. No public API/webhook was verified for this build.
2 · Zapier / MakeUse only with an authorized API, webhook, email/record-alert trigger, or approved file-export workflow.
3 · CSV ImportCurrent fallback. Export/enter public-record fields, normalize them, then preview locally in this static site.
Research architecture

Each county has separate commissioner, planning, elections/campaign-finance, contracts/procurement and parcel/deed nodes. LANDEX-backed counties can now be tracked through a dedicated integration hub, while counties using other record systems remain jurisdiction-specific. Deep financial or project relationships remain unverified until supported by primary records. Cross-county entities are shown only where a documented regional governance relationship exists.