Comparative institutions / scenario laboratory

Governance Atlas

Research edition · v1
A map of possibilities, not a verdict. Historical evidence informs the questions. Sandbox numbers are synthetic, user-adjustable indices—not calibrated forecasts, country ratings, or probabilities.

Authority and ownership are separate dimensions

Choose an ideal type, then change its institutions. Dots are illustrative placements, not empirical measurements. Elite capture is a separate control.

Concentrated political authority ↑
↓ Dispersed / anti-authoritarian authority
Public / collective
Private / market
Read the axes carefully

The horizontal axis represents ownership, not whether exchange uses markets. Worker cooperatives can trade in markets; private firms can depend on state allocation. Political authority is independent of both. Oligarchy means concentrated elite influence, which can coexist with private or state ownership.

Democratic socialism seeks democratic social ownership; social democracy usually retains a mixed capitalist economy with redistribution. They have separate presets here. Communism as a stateless, classless ideal is separated from historical communist party states. Libertarianism includes both market and socialist traditions.

Historical evidence & limits

These sources anchor interpretation; none supplies the preset coordinates or sandbox coefficients. Historical outcomes also depend on war, sanctions, resources, inherited wealth, demographics, administrative capacity, and international conditions.

Evidence lensWhat it supports exploringWhat it cannot establish
V-Dem democracy reports and datasetsElectoral competition, expression, institutional constraints, and changes in political authority.A single ideology’s inevitable outcome or a causal effect of economic ownership.
Library of Congress: Soviet archivesSoviet party censorship, repression, forced mobilization, and historical centralized rule.That all socialism is authoritarian, or that a stateless communist ideal was implemented.
OECD: poverty and inequality, 2025Taxes and transfers reduce measured income inequality in the OECD countries with available data.That democratic socialism and social democracy are interchangeable or redistribution alone determines prosperity.
Gilens & Page (2014): US policy influenceTesting elite and interest-group influence on 1,779 policy issues from 1981–2002.A universal classification of capitalism as oligarchy or a current rating of any country.
World Bank: governance methodologyMultidimensional governance measurement and uncertainty in perception-based estimates.A validated causal forecast from a regime label.

Open model: challenge the assumptions

The simulation is a cross-sectional thought experiment, not a time-series prediction. Each draw samples independent normal noise around a linear score and clips the result to 0–100. Its range reflects chosen noise only; it is not a historical confidence interval. Shared shocks and institutional feedback are not modeled.

Edit the coefficient matrix to test competing hypotheses. Columns correspond to the six controls, normalized to 0–1. Negative coefficients are allowed. Results follow the assumptions you supply.

Equations, reproducibility, and research use
score[j] = clamp(intercept[j] + Σ coefficient[j,k] × input[k]/100 + σ × Normal(0,1), 0, 100)
2,000 draws per outcome; seeded Mulberry32 generator; Box–Muller normal noise.
Reported quantiles: 10th, 50th, 90th percentile. Same seed and assumptions reproduce results.
Default coefficients and presets are author-selected hypotheses, not fitted statistical estimates.
No welfare weights, causal identification, or objective ranking is implied.

To make empirical predictions, first define outcomes and a country-year sample; merge versioned V-Dem, WGI, OECD or World Bank observations; pre-register controls; account for confounding, reverse causality, missing data and dependence; validate out of sample. Pure ideological ideals often lack comparable national cases. This edition does not claim that work has been completed.

Evidence checked October 5, 2026. Use historical precedents as context, inspect assumptions, and retain disagreement.